- Journal List
- Springer
- PMC4149880
As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsem*nt of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health.
Learn more: PMC Disclaimer | PMC Copyright Notice
Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 2014; 69(3): 276–282.
Published online 2014 Jun 18. doi:10.1007/s11130-014-0425-x
PMCID: PMC4149880
PMID: 24938316
Marzanna Hęś,1 Krzysztof Dziedzic,
1 Danuta Górecka,1 Agnieszka Drożdżyńska,2 and Elżbieta Gujska3
Author information Copyright and License information PMC Disclaimer
Abstract
In recent years, there has been an ever-increasing interest in the research of polyphenols obtained from dietary sources, and their antioxidative properties. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of boiling buckwheat and barley groats on the antioxidant properties and dietary fiber composition. Antioxidative properties were investigated using methyl linoleate model system, by assessing the DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) radical scavenging activity and metal chelating activity. The results were compared with butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT). Raw barley and buckwheat groats extracts showed higher DPPH scavenging ability compared to boiled barley and buckwheat groats extracts. Raw barley groats extract exhibited higher antioxidant activity than boiled groats extract in the methyl linoleate emulsion. Higher chelating ability in relation to Fe (II) ions was observed for boiled groats extracts as compared to raw groats extracts. BHT showed small antiradical activity and metal chelating activity, while showing higher antioxidative activity in emulsion system. The analysis of groats extracts using HPLC method showed the presence of rutin, catechin, quercetin, gallic, p-hydroxybenzoic, p-coumaric, o-coumaric, vanillic, sinapic, and ferulic acids. Differences in the content of dietary fiber and its fractions were observed in the examined products. The highest total dietary fiber content was detected in boiled buckwheat groats, while the lowest - in boiled barley groats. The scientific achievements of this research could help consumers to choose those cereal products available on the market, such as barley and buckwheat groats, which are a rich source of antioxidative compounds and dietary fiber.
Keywords: Barley groats, Buckwheat groats, Polyphenols, Antioxidant activity, Dietary fiber
Introduction
One of the possible modifications of dietary composition, aiming at improving its health promoting properties, is to increase the content of natural non-nutritive food substances with beneficial biological properties. In this group, apart from antioxidant vitamins, carotenoids, minerals and dietary fiber, we can classify low-molecular-weight secondary metabolites of plants [1, 2].
Cereals and pseudo cereals are an important source of macronutrients and bioactive substances with antioxidant activity [3]. Growing interest in barley has been observed recently, due to its high levels of soluble fiber and phenolic compounds such as: benzoic and cinnamic acid derivatives, proanthocyanidins, quinines, flavonols, chalcones, flavones, flavanones, and amino phenolic compounds. The major phenolic acid found in barley is ferulic acid [4, 5]. Therefore, barley can be an excellent source of natural antioxidants to inhibit lipid oxidation, or for disease prevention and health promotion [6]. Buckwheat grain contains proteins with high biological value and balanced amino acid composition, relatively high dietary fiber content and vitamins B1, B2, B6, rutin and quercetin, the content of which changes depending on technological parameters applied in seed processing [1, 7].
The technological production process of buckwheat and barley groats includes such stages as cleaning and thermal conditioning (roasting) of grains, size sorting, dehulling, sorting after dehulling and sorting of groats connected with the separation of waste and by-products [8]. The most common form of processing groats is boiling in water. The boiled final product can have various levels of consistency – porridge-like, crumbly or loose. The most beneficial method of preparation, which preserves all nutritive values, is boiling groats loose, so that water is completely absorbed. There are very few studies describing antioxidative action of polyphenols derived from buckwheat or barley seeds and buckwheat or barley products, and determining the effect of thermal processing on their activity. Thus, the aim of this work was to determine the effect of boiling on dietary fiber composition and antioxidant activity of phenolic compounds in barley and buckwheat groats.
Materials and Methods
Materials
Grains of barley Antek cultivar were obtained from Breading Station Danko (Poland) and were used for production of barley groats. Buckwheat grains (fa*gopyrum esculentum Moench), Kora cultivar were obtain from Breading Station Palikije (Poland) and were used for production of buckwheat groats. Raw buckwheat groats were roasted and dehulled in industrial environment. Barley and buckwheat groats were used both as raw as well as boiled material. The groats were boiled with water/groats ratio of 2:1 (v/v), for 30min until water has been completely absorbed. After boiling the groats were lyophilized and then comminuted in a Cyclotec mill.
Chemicals
The following chemicals were used: 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), Folin-Ciocalteu reagent (FCR), (+) catechin, 3-(2-pyridyl)-5,6-bis (4-phenyl-sulfonic acid)-1,2,4-triazine (Ferrozine), Tween 20, α-amylase, pepsin, pancreatin, phenolic acids: o-coumaric, p-coumaric, ferulic, sinapic, vanillic, gallic, and p-hydroxybenzoic; flavonoids: catechine, quercetin, and rutin were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Germany); acetone, methanol, ethanol, sodium carbonate POCH (Poland), methyl linoleate Nu-Chek Prep. (USA); BHT Merck (Germany), thermostable α-amylase from Novozymes (Denmark). All other chemicals were of analytical grade.
Chemical Analysis
Phenolic compounds were extracted from ground samples according to Amarowicz et al. [9] with 80% (v/v) aqueous acetone at 80°C for 15min at a solid to solvent ratio of 1:10 (w/v). The content of total phenolic compounds in extract was estimated using the Folin-Ciocalteu reagent (FCR) [10]. Aliquot of extract (0.5mL) was added to 8mL distilled water and 5mL FCR. The mixture was mixed with 1mL of saturated sodium carbonate solution. After incubation at room temperature for 60min, the absorbance of the mixture was read at 750nm. Results are expressed as mg of (+) catechin equivalents per gram of dry matter extract (mg CE/g).
The content of flavonoids and phenolic acids was estimated using the method described by Drożdżyńska et al. [11]. Fast liquid chromatography (FLC) was performed with an Agilent Technologies 1200 series system. Chromatograms were recorded at 280nm for gallic acid, vanillic acid, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, and catechin at 320nm for p-coumaric, o-coumaric, sinapic, ferulic acids, and at 360nm for rutin and quercetin.
The ability to inhibit autoxidation of methyl linoleate was determined following Lingnert et al. [12]. The method consisted of the spectrophotometric (λ = 234nm) determination of the increment in the contents of conjugated dienes in methyl linoleate emulsion after 19h of incubation in the dark at 37°C. Antioxidant efficiency coefficient (AEC) was expressed as the ratio of the increment in absorbance of the control sample and tested sample to the increase in absorbance of the control sample.
The capacity of the prepared extract to scavenge the stable free radical 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) was monitored according to the method of Sanchez-Moreno et al. [13]. DPPH (1mM, 0.25mL) was dissolved in pure methanol and was added to 0.1mL of polyphenol extracts with 2mL of methanol. The decrease in absorbance of the resulting solution was determined at 517nm at 30min.
The chelation of ferrous ions by extracts was estimated using the method of Tang et al. [14]. The assay consisted of the colorimetric measurements of the degree of discolouration of iron (II) chloride (2mM, 0.1mL) complexes with ferrozine (5mM, 0.2mL) caused by the extracts. The applied wavelength was 562nm.
The content of total dietary fiber (TDF), soluble dietary fiber (SDF) and insoluble dietary fiber (IDF) was estimated according to Asp et al. [15]. Dietary fiber was determined under conditions similar to those found in the human alimentary tract using the following enzymes: thermostable α-amylase (pH 6.0, 90 °C, Termamyl 120 L), pepsin (pH1.5, 40°C) and pancreatin (pH6.8, 40°C). The contents of neutral dietary fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), lignin and cellulose were determined using the detergent method according to Van Soest [16], as modified by McQueen and Nicholson [17].
Statistical Analysis
All data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the general linear models of statistical analysis system software (version 8). The significant differences among multiple groups were determined by Tukey’s test (P < 0.05). Spearman’s rank correlation was used to determine the correlation coefficient between the content of phenolic compounds and the content of fiber and its fractions in groats, and their antioxidative properties.
Results and Discussion
The total phenolic content in buckwheat groats was higher than in the barley groats (Table1). Boiling affected the total content of phenolic compounds in groats. Extracts of boiled buckwheat groats showed a significantly higher content of polyphenols than raw buckwheat groats. However, extracts of raw barley groats contained more total phenolic in comparison to boiled groats. Statistical analysis showed a correlation of polyphenols in groats with antioxidant activities (r = 0.80 for DPPH scavenging activity, antioxidant efficiency coefficient and chelating activity). Boiling of barley and buckwheat groats also affected the content of flavonoids and phenolic acids (Table2). Boiled buckwheat groats contained significantly more catechins in comparison to raw buckwheat groats, respectively 62.12 and 46.47mg/kg DM. extract and significantly less p-coumaric acid (0.91mg/kg DM extract) in comparison to raw buckwheat (7.26mg/kg DM extract). Heat treatment of barley groats caused a decrease in the content of sinapic acid (19%) in comparison to raw barley groats and a slight increase in ferulic acid content (3%). Boiling of buckwheat groats did not induce any change in the content of rutin. Higher content of polyphenols in boiled buckwheat groats was possibly due to their partial release from the bound form with proteins as a result of boiling. Moreover, phenolics may also be associated with other plant components such as carbohydrates. Technological processing can modify the polyphenol content of foods in several ways [18]. The influence of processing on the content of phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of vegetables, fruits, seeds of legume plants and cereals is not unequivocal, and changes in antioxidant activity of the technological processes depend on the raw material used and the processing conditions, mainly the time and temperature of the process [18]. Kreft et al. [19] observed a decreased content of rutin after boiling buckwheat groats for 60min. In research studies the manually hulled seeds were used as material. Studies conducted by Zhang et al. [20] showed that roasting, pressured-steam heating and microwave heating of buckwheat flour caused a decrease in total phenolics, total flavonoids and antioxidative activities. A significant decrease in the total phenolic content and total flavonoid content was observed upon extrusion [21]. On the other hand, it has been demonstrated that the process of boiling can lead to increased phenolic content in green beans, bell pepper and broccolis [22] and an increased level of free flavonols in tomatoes [23]. Zieliński et al. [24] observed a five-fold increase in the content of ferulic acid in cereal material upon extrusion.
Table 1
Total phenolic content in groats extracts
| Sample | Total phenolic (mg CE*/kg DM extract) |
|---|---|
| Raw barley groats | 6800 ± 50b |
| Boiled barley groats | 6100 ± 70a |
| Raw buckwheat groats | 9200 ± 100c |
| Boiled buckwheat groats | 13500 ± 120d |
Open in a separate window
* CE - catechin equivalents; different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05). Mean values ± SD (n = 3)
Table 2
Polyphenol content in groats extracts
| Phenolics substances (mg/kg DM extract) | Raw buckwheat groats | Boiled buckwheat groats | Raw barley groats | Boiled barley groats |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rutin | 69.95 ± 2.25a | 70.48 ± 3.27a | nd | nd |
| Catechin | 46.47 ± 0.17a | 62.12 ± 6.04b | 1312.47 ± 7.11c | 1321.58 ± 6.20c |
| Quercetin | 1.67 ± 0.03a | 1.48 ± 0.16a | nd | nd |
| p-Coumaric acid | 7.26 ± 0.11b | 0.91 ± 0.02a | 42.16 ± 1.10c | 49.61 ± 1.75d |
| o-Coumaric acid | nd | nd | 28.29 ± 1.25a | 29.94 ± 1.15a |
| Vanillic acid | nd | nd | 4.77 ± 0.11a | 4.76 ± 0.09a |
| Sinapic acid | nd | nd | 19.23 ± 1.53b | 15.62 ± 1.25a |
| Ferulic acid | nd | nd | 84.92 ± 2.30a | 87.37 ± 2.15a |
| p-Hydroxybenzoic acid | 22.06 ± 1.55 | nd | nd | nd |
| Gallic acid | 3.83 ± 0.08a | 4.08 ± 0.10a | nd | nd |
Open in a separate window
nd – not detected; different letters in the same row indicate significant differences (P < 0.05). Mean values ± SD (n = 3)
The free radical 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) scavenging activity for different kinds of groats extract are shown in Fig.1. Higher DPPH radical scavenging capacity was found for the extracts of raw buckwheat (84.8%) and barley (67.9%) groats in comparison to boiled buckwheat and barley groats, 74.1 and 62.4%, respectively. Significantly weaker antiradical properties (24.4%) were found for butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT). The antioxidative compounds in food can interact, which leads to unforeseeable changes in the levels of antioxidative activity. It has also been put forward that, in addition to phenolic compounds, other buckwheat components influence its activity. This could explain a lower free radical DPPH scavenging activity of boiled buckwheat groats, where a higher polyphenol content was assayed. Food processing can further influence these changes in activity levels [25, 26].
Fig. 1
The DPPH scavenging of groats extracts. Different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05). Mean values ± SD (n = 4)
Figure2 shows the effect of extract on the stability of methyl linoleate in emulsion. Antioxidant efficiency coefficient (AEC) showed high antioxidant activity of groats extracts. Significantly higher ability to inhibit autoxidation of methyl linoleate was exhibited by the extract of raw barley groats (AEC = 0.87) than its boiled form (AEC = 0.82). Both extracts of buckwheat groats very actively inhibited oxidative changes in the emulsion. Their activity was comparable to BHT (AEC = 0.89). Sun and Ho [27] found that the methanolic extract of buckwheat seed inhibited oxidation of β-carotene emulsion more effectively than the acetone, butanol or ethanol extracts; however, the activity of the analyzed extracts was much lower than that of BHT and BHA (butylated hydroxyanisole).
Fig. 2
Antioxidant activity of groats extracts in methyl linoleate emulsion. AEC – Antioxidant efficiency coefficient. Different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05). Mean values ± SD (n = 4)
The ability of the extracts to chelate iron ions was presented in Fig.3. The type of extract significantly affected the capacity to form iron ion complexes. Among groats extracts a higher capacity of Fe(II) ion chelating was found for extracts of boiled groats (barley groats – 53.9%, buckwheat groats – 69.4%) than raw groats, 48.0 and 57.6%, respectively. A slight activity was shown by BHT (19.1%). The metal chelating capacity may significantly influence the course of oxidative reactions, thus metal binding compounds are included in the class of oxidation inhibitors.
Fig. 3
The chelating activity of groats extracts. Different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05). Mean values ± SD (n = 4)
The antioxidant activity of extracts is not always dependent on the level of phenolic compounds, but can be different depending on used methods [28]. Therefore it is difficult to compare results obtained using different methods; however, they indicate a diversity of mechanisms of action of antioxidants. A decreased content of natural antioxidants in a product can be accompanied by their higher antioxidative activity, due to more easily accessible antioxidants of other types [26]. According to Grajek [29], the beneficial influence of short-lived thermal processing on the antioxidative activity can be attributed to the removal of oxygen, denaturation of enzymes from the oxidoreductase group and the transition of the antioxidant into a more active form (aglycone). Studies conducted by Sensoy et al. [18] showed that roasting at 200°C for 10min slightly decreased in buckwheat flour the radical scavenging activity, whereas extrusion (170°C) did not cause any change. The results suggest that processing conditions can be optimized to retain the health promoting compounds in products. The reason for reducing antioxidant activity in processing of raw materials could include oxidation of antioxidant, complexation with other food ingredients, enzymatic modification, increased oxidative capacity of the environment and the transition from antioxidant to pro-oxidant. Oxidation processes are particularly dangerous [25, 29]. The boiling of plant material could lead to rapid heat transfer into the tissue and enlarge losses of antioxidants, and to partial extraction of hydrophilic antioxidants into water, decreasing the antioxidant capacity of boiled samples [30].
The highest content of total dietary fiber (TDF) was shown in boiled buckwheat groats (16.45%), while the lowest in boiled barley groats (7.99%) (Table3). The highest level of insoluble dietary fiber (IDF) was found in boiled buckwheat groats (13.10%), while the lowest in boiled barley groats (5.19%) (Table3). The content of the soluble dietary fiber (SDF) fraction ranged from 2.21% (raw buckwheat groats) to 4.56% (raw barley groats).
Table 3
Content of TDF, NDF and its fractions
| Fraction of dietary fiber (g/100g product) | Raw buckwheat groats | Boiled buckwheat groats | Raw barley groats | Boiled barley groats |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total dietary fiber | ||||
| TDF | 12.18 ± 0.24b | 16.45 ± 0.26d | 13.21 ± 0.39c | 7.99 ± 0.36a |
| IDF | 9.97 ± 0.22c | 13.10 ± 0.16d | 8.65 ± 0.34b | 5.19 ± 0.17a |
| SDF | 2.21 ± 0.02a | 3.35 ± 0.22c | 4.56 ± 0.09d | 2.80 ± 0.14b |
| Neutral dietary fiber | ||||
| NDF | 10.00 ± 0.72c | 11.26 ± 0.47c | 7.06 ± 0.07b | 4.22 ± 0.40a |
| C | 0.67 ± 0.12a | 2.34 ± 0.54b | 4.00 ± 0.26c | 0.78 ± 0.37a |
| H | 6.94 ± 0.61b | 2.69 ± 0.61a | 2.84 ± 0.33a | 3.31 ± 0.07a |
| L | 2.39 ± 0.01b | 6.24 ± 0.23c | 0.22 ± 0.14a | 0.12 ± 0.02a |
Open in a separate window
TDF – total dietary fiber; IDF - insoluble dietary fiber; SDF - soluble dietary fiber; NDF- neutral detergent fiber; C - cellulose; H - hemicellulose; L – lignin; different letters in the same row indicate significant differences (P < 0.05). Mean values ± SD (n = 3)
The groats showed varied content of dietary fiber fractions. The highest lignin level was found in boiled buckwheat groats (6.24%), while the lowest in boiled barley groats (0.12%). The highest content of cellulose was observed for raw barley groats (4.00%), while the lowest for raw buckwheat groats and boiled barley groats, 0.67 and 0.78%, respectively. A significantly higher content of hemicelluloses was found in raw buckwheat groats (6.94%) in comparison with other groats. It was shown that the content of IDF, neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and lignin in groats was correlated with antioxidant activities (r = 0.80).
A study by Gualberto et al. [31] indicates that changes in the content of SDF and IDF depend on the type of the cereal raw material. Those authors showed no effect of extrusion on the content of dietary fiber of wheat bran, while in case of oat and rice bran they found a slight decrease in the content of the IDF fraction and an increase in the content of the SDF fraction. An increase in the content of dietary fiber, mainly the lignin fraction, may be related to Maillard’s reaction products being formed during thermal processing, which in the Van Soest method are determined as the lignin fraction [32]. A similar trend was also observed by Valiente et al. [33], and Dziedzic et al. [8].
Conclusions
Barley and buckwheat groats are products very rich in bioactive substances such as dietary fiber and polyphenols. Boiling for 30min in 2:1 (water:groats) ratio does not affect the nutritional properties of buckwheat groats in any negative way. It should be emphasized that this is the recommended way of cooking buckwheat groats. Extracts of boiled buckwheat groats showed a significantly higher content of polyphenols and total dietary fiber than raw buckwheat groats. Both boiled groats extracts formed complexes with iron ions to a higher degree than raw groats extracts. Buckwheat and barley have a high potential as materials for functional food development and production. They would be an ideal possible base for the design of novel foods.
Conflict of Interest
none
References
1. Bonafaccia G, Marocchini M, Kreft I. Composition and technological properties of the flour and bran from common and Tartary buckwheat. Food Chem. 2003;80:9–15. doi:10.1016/S0308-8146(02)00228-5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
2. Yao LH, Jiang YM, Shi J, Tomás-Barberán FA, Datta N, Singanusong R, Chen SS. Flavonoids in food and their health benefits. Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 2004;59:113–122. doi:10.1007/s11130-004-0049-7. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
3. Adom K, Liu R. Antioxidant activity of grains. J Agric Food Chem. 2002;50:6182–6187. doi:10.1021/jf0205099. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
4. Sharma P, Gujral HS. Antioxidant and polyphenol oxidase activity of germinated barley and its milling fractions. Food Chem. 2010;120:673–678. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.10.059. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
5. Klepacka J, Gujska E, Michalak J. Phenolic compounds as cultivar- and variety-distinguishing factors in some products. Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 2011;66:64–69. doi:10.1007/s11130-010-0205-1. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
6. Liu Q, Yao H. Antioxidant activities of barley seeds extracts. Food Chem. 2007;102:732–737. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.06.051. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
7. Zadernowski R, Pierzynowska-Korniak G, Ciepielewska D, Fornal Ł. Chemical characteristics and biological functions of phenolic acids of buckwheat and lentil seeds. fa*gopyrum. 1992;12:27–35. [Google Scholar]
8. Dziedzic K, Górecka D, Kucharska M, Przybylska B. Influence of technological process during buckwheat groats production on dietary fiber content and sorption of bile acids. Food Res Int. 2012;47:279–283. doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2011.07.020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
9. Amarowicz R, Piskuła M, Honke J, Rudnicka B, Troszyńska A, Kozłowska H. Extraction of phenolic compounds from lentil seeds (Lens culinaris) with various solvents. Pol J Food Nutr Sci. 1995;4(45):53–62. [Google Scholar]
10. Horwitz W (1970) Official Meth. Anal. Ass. Official Anal. Chem. Washington, DC. 15.049-15.055
11. Drożdżyńska A, Dziedzic K, Kośmider A, Leja K, Czaczyk K, Górecka D. Application of fast liquid chromatography for antioxidants analysis. ACTA Sci Pol Technol Aliment. 2012;11:19–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12. Lingnert H, Vallentin K, Eriksson CE (1979) Measurement of antioxidative effect in model system. J Food Proc Preserv 3:87–103
13. Sanchez-Moreno C, Larrauri JA, Saura-Calixto F. A procedure to measure the antiradical efficiency of polyphenols. J Sci Food Agric. 1998;76:270–276. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199802)76:2<270::AID-JSFA945>3.0.CO;2-9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
14. Tang SZ, Kerry JP, Sheehan D, Buckley DJ. Antioxidative mechanism of tea catechins in chicken meat systems. Food Chem. 2002;76:45–51. doi:10.1016/S0308-8146(01)00248-5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
15. Asp NG, Johanson CG, Halmer H. Rapid enzymatic assay of insoluble and soluble dietary fiber. J Agric Food Chem. 1983;31:476–482. doi:10.1021/jf00117a003. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
16. Van Soest PJ (1967) Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. IV. Determination of plant cell wall constituents. J Assoc Off Anal Chem 50:50–55
17. McQueen RE, Nicholson JWG (1979) Modification of the neutral detergent fiber procedure for cereals and vegetables by using α-amylase. J Assoc Off Anal Chem 62:676–680
18. Sensoy I, Rosen RT, Ho C, Karwe MV. Effect of processing on buckwheat phenolics and antioxidant activity. Food Chem. 2006;99:388–393. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.08.007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
19. Kreft I, Fabjan N, Yasumoto K. Rutin content in buckwheat (fa*gopyrum esculentum Moench) food materials and products. Food Chem. 2006;98:508–512. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.05.081. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
20. Zhang M, Chen H, Li J, Pei Y, Liang Y. Antioxidant properties of tartary buckwheat extracts as affected by different thermal processing methods. LWT-Food Sci Technol. 2010;43:181–185. doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2009.06.020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
21. Sharma P, Gujral HS, Singh B. Antioxidant activity of barley as affected by extrusion cooking. Food Chem. 2012;131:1406–1413. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.10.009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
22. Turkmen N, Sari F, Velioglu SY. The effect of cooking methods on total phenolics and antioxidant activity of selected green vegetables. Food Chem. 2005;93:713–718. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.12.038. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
23. Stewart AJ, Bozonnet S, Mullen W, Jenkins GI, Michael EJ, Crozier A. Occurrence of flavonols in tomatoes and tomato-based products. J Agric Food Chem. 2000;48:2663–2669. doi:10.1021/jf000070p. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
24. Zieliński H, Kozłowska H, Lewczuk B. Bioactive compounds in the cereal grains before and after hydrothermal processing. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. 2001;2(3):159–169. doi:10.1016/S1466-8564(01)00040-6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
25. Ioannou I, Hafsa I, Hamdi S, Charbonnel C, Ghoul M. Review of the effects of food processing and formulation on flavonol and anthocyanin behaviour. J Food Eng. 2012;111:208–217. doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2012.02.006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
26. Gumul D, Korus J, Achremowicz B. The effect of processing operations on the antioxidant activity of plant raw materials. ZNTJ. 2005;4(45):42–48. [Google Scholar]
27. Sun T, Ho CT. Antioxidant activities of buckwheat extracts. Food Chem. 2005;90:743–749. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.04.035. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
28. Kähkönen MP, Hopia AT, Vuorela HJ, Rauha J-P, Pihlaja K, Kujala TS, Heinonen M. Antioxidant activity of plant extracts containing phenolic compounds. J Agric Food Chem. 1999;47:3954–3962. doi:10.1021/jf990146l. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
29. Grajek W. Changes of antioxidative potential of plant materials during processing and intestine digestion. ZNTJ. 2003;4(37):26–35. [Google Scholar]
30. Amin I, Norazaidah K, Hainida E. Antioxidant activity and phenolic content of raw and blanched Amaranthus species. Food Chem. 2006;94:47–52. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.10.048. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
31. Gualberto DG, Bergman CJ, Kazemzadeh M, Weber CW. Effect of extrusion processing on the soluble and insoluble dietary fiber, and phytic acid contents of cereal brans. Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 1997;51:187–198. doi:10.1023/A:1007941032726. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
32. Anderson NE, Clydesdale FM. Effects of processing on the dietary fiber content of wheat bran, pureed green beans, and carrots. J Food Sci. 1980;45:1533–1537. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.1980.tb07556.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
33. Valiente C, Esteban RM, Mollá E, López-Andréu FJ. Roasting effects on dietary fiber composition of cocoa beans. J Food Sci. 1994;59:123–124. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.1994.tb06914.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Articles from Plant Foods for Human Nutrition (Dordrecht, Netherlands) are provided here courtesy of Springer
